Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-04-25 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-04-25 Senate Journal Page 3566 HB 465 SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 465(RLS) am S was read the third time. HB 465 Senator Salo moved and asked unanimous consent that the Senate return to second reading for the purpose of rescinding its previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 2 (page 3531). Senator Green objected, then withdrew her objection. There being no further objections, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Salo moved that the Senate rescind its previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 2. The question being: Shall the Senate rescind its previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 2? The roll was taken with the following result: 1996-04-25 Senate Journal Page 3567 HB 465 SCS CSHB 465(RLS) am S Rescind Previous Action YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson and so, the Senate failed to rescind its previous action. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 465(RLS) am S was automatically in third reading. Senator Kelly moved and asked unanimous consent that the Senate return to second reading for the purpose of rescinding its previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 1 (page 3530). Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Kelly moved that the Senate rescind its previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 1. The question being: Shall the Senate rescind its previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 1? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 465(RLS) am S Rescind Previous Action YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Salo, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Green, Leman, Rieger, Sharp and so, the Senate rescinded its previous action. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1996-04-25 Senate Journal Page 3568 HB 465 SCS CSHB 465(RLS) am S Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Salo, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Leman, Rieger, Sharp and so, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 465(RLS) am S was automatically in third reading. The question being: Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 465(RLS) am S An Act relating to employment of teachers and school administrators and to public school collective bargaining; and providing for an effective date pass the Senate? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 465(RLS) am S Third Reading - Final Passage YEAS: 12 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson Nays: Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, R.Phillips, Salo, Zharoff and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 465(RLS) am S passed the Senate. Senator Halford moved the effective date clause. The question being: Shall the effective date clause be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1996-04-25 Senate Journal Page 3569 HB 465 SCS CSHB 465(RLS) am S Effective Date Vote YEAS: 20 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff and so, the effective date clause was adopted and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.